Campus Virtuales

La mejora de interfaces gráficas por décadas se enfocó a la usabilidad; actualmente, con la inclusión de elementos pertenecientes al usuario, se enfoca a proveer una experiencia más enriquecedora desde el punto de vista emocional. Según señalan los investigadores las interfaces enfocadas a usabilidad son satisfactoriamente aceptadas pero no siempre los usuarios están ligados o involucrados a usarlas, el enlace emocional es tan importante como la usabilidad porque crea satisfacción, cierta lealtad y compromiso.La usabilidad es un componente importante de la experiencia pero no es un indicador suficiente para saber si la percepción del usuario, respecto a la interacción con la computadora, es negativa o positiva. El presente artículo se explora el impacto del diseño emocional implementado en objetos de aprendizaje, se presentan las correlaciones Pearson entre las variables de implementaciones de diseño emocional en objetos de aprendizaje y satisfacción del usuario.

The focus of this correlational study was to determine the extent that emotional design was correlated with perceptions of user’s satisfaction, usability and usefulness of learning object on courses on-line, emotional design has become a design trend against a previous interface design paradigm based on interface functionalism and cognitive factors; The aim of emotional design is to improve users’ experience using social rules influence without coercion, some strategies of emotional design which can be implemented on learning object are: presenting contents as stories, using faces and personas - composite user archetypes that use realistic names, faces, and personalities to foster user empathy within a product-, short tasks oriented.Results reveal that there is a significant positive correlation between users’ satisfaction and using faces and personas –belonging to emotional design-, also there is a significant positive correlation between users’ satisfaction and learning object evaluation section –belonging to learning object design-, by now we can not specify which factor is most influential –emotional design or learning object design- in user acceptance, Finally about usability variable we cannot found any significance correlation.

Palabras Clave/Keywords

Palabras Clave / Keywords

Objetos de Aprendizaje, Diseño Emocional, Tecnología Persuasiva.

Learning Object, Emotional Design, Persuasive Technology.

Referencias/References

Referencias / References

Walter, A. (2011) Designing for emotion, Publisher: Jeffrey Zeldman, ISBN 978-1-937557-00-3, A Book Apart, New York.

Norman, D.A. (2004) Emotional Design: Why We Love (Or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books

Martinez, M. (2001) Key Design Considerations for Personalized Learning on the Web, Educational Technology & Society 4(1), ISSN 1436-4522,

Russell, T. (1997) Technology wars: Winners and losers. Educom Review, 32 (2), 44-46, 1997 http://search.excite.com/relocate/sr=webresult|ss=%22Technology+wars%3A+Winners+and+ losers%22|id=33217687;http://www.educause.edu/pub/er/review/reviewArticles/32244.html

Kurosu, M. and Kashimura, K. (1995)Apparent Usability vs. inherent Usability: experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent Usability, Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, p.292-293, May 07-11, 1995, Denver, Colorado,United States.

Fogg, B.J. (2003)Persuasive Technology. Using computers to change what we think and do. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann Inc. ISBN-13: 978-1558606432.

Verbeek, P.P. (2005) What Things Do – Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Penn State: Penn State University Press.

Ihde, D. (1990) Technology and the Lifeworld. Bloomington/Minneapolis: Indiana University Press, 1990

Latour, B. (1994) ‘On Technical Mediation -- Philosophy, Sociology, Genealogy’. In:Common Knowledge 3, 29-64.

Borgmann, A. (1984) Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

Medina, J. (2014) Brain Rules (12 Principles for Surviving and Thriving at Work, Home, and School, 2nd edition, ISBN-13: 978-0983263371 Amazon.com

Dandavate, U, Sanders, E. & Stuart, S. (1996) Emotions matter: user empathy in the product development process. In proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting – 1996, 415-418,

Jordan, P.W. (1996) Displeasure and how to avoid it. In S. Robertson (ed.), Contemporary Ergonomics 1996: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society, 56-61.

Moggridge, B. (1999) Expressing Experiences in Design. Interactions, July 1999, 17-25,

Rijken, D.& Mulder, B. (1996)Information ecologies, experience and ergonomics. In P.W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B.a.Weerdmeester and I.L. McClelland, Usability evaluation in Industry. Taylor & Francis, 49-58.

Holman, R.H. (1986)Advertising and Emotionality. In R.A. Peterson, W.D. Hoyer, and W.R. Wilson (eds.) The role of affect in consumer behavior. Lexington Books, 119-140.

Montague, M. (19979 Integrating the PRODUCT+BRAND Experience. Design Management Journal, Spring 1999, 17-23.

O’Connor, I.J. (1997)Using Attitudinal Segmentation to Target the Consumer. In L.R. Kahle& L. Chiagouris, Values, Lifestyles, and Psychographics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 231-246. 1997

Akey, T.M. (2006) School Context, Student Attitudes and Behavior, and Academic Achievement: An Exploratory Analysis: 1-52: MDRC.

Fredricks, J.A. Blumenfeld, P.C.&Paris, A.H. (2004) School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 74, No. 1 (Spring, 2004), pp. 59-109 Published by: American Educational Research Association. 2004

Joselowsky, F. (2007)Youth engagement , high school reform and improved learning outcomes: Building systemic approaches for youth engagement. NASSP (National Association of Secondary by School Principals) Bulletin,91(3),257-276. 2007 Consultadoenfeb 2014 http://bul.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/91/3/257

Thüring, M.&Mahlke, S. (2007) Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human technology interaction. International Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 253-264. doi:10.1080/00207590701396674

Roto, V. Law, E.Vermeeren, A.&Hoonhout, J. (2011) User Experience White Paper. DagstuhlSeminar on Demarcating User Experience. 2011 Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:USER+EXPERIENCE+WHITE+PAPER#9

Young, S.& Bruce, M.A. (2011) Classroom Community and Student Engagement in Online Courses, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching Vol. 7, No. 2, June 2011

Polsani, P.R. (2003) Use and Abuse of Reusable Learning Objects,Journal of Digital Information, volumen3, número 4, artículo No. 164.Disponible en: http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v03/i04/Polsani/ 2003

Lekkas,Z.Tsianos,N. Germanakos,P.Mourlas,C. & Samaras, G.(2008)The Role of Emotions in the Design of Personalized Educational Systems, 2008,Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

Kort, B.& Reilly, R. (2002) “Analytical Models of Emotions, Learning and Relationships: Towards an Affect-Sensitive Cognitive Machine”. Conference on Virtual Worlds and Simulation (VWSim 2002),http://affect.media.mit.edu/projectpages/lc/vworlds.pdf.

Goleman, D. (1995)Emotional Intelligence: why it can matter more than IQ, New York: 1995 Bantam Books.

Salovey, P.&Mayer,J.D. (1990) “Emotional intelligence”. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, 185-211. 1990

Sillence, E.Briggs,P. Harris, (2009)Healthy persuasion: web sites that you can trustProceedings of the Persuasive Technology and Digital Behaviour Intervention Symposium 2009ISBN - 1902956745

Gay, L.R. Mills, G.E.&Airasian,P. (2009)Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Columbus, OH: Merrill. 2009

Cómo citar/How to cite

Cómo citar / How to cite

Cardona Salas, J. P. (2015). Estudio correlacional de implementación de diseño emocional en Objetos de Aprendizaje. Campus Virtuales, Vol. IV, num. 1, pp. 44-54. Consultado el [dd/mm/aaaa] en www.revistacampusvirtuales.es